← Back to Blog

Creating Spaces Where People Thrive

7 min read

Psychological Safety is something many of us struggle with, yet the science of happiness and well-being has revealed powerful strategies that can make a real difference.

Changing workplace culture to reject the ideal worker norm reduces stress and supports work-life balance.

In this guide, we’ll explore evidence-based approaches to psychological safety, drawing on the latest research in positive psychology and behavioral science. You’ll learn practical strategies you can implement today, backed by studies from leading researchers in the field.

Whether you’re just starting your wellness journey or looking to deepen your practice, these insights will help you make meaningful progress.

Understanding Psychological Safety

Before diving into strategies, it’s important to understand why psychological safety matters for our overall well-being.

Healthy norms fuel connection and well-being while enabling mastery through focused work. When availability expectations change, people can recover, think clearly, and show up fully at work and at home.

The connection between psychological safety and happiness is well-documented in research. When we actively work on this area of our lives, we often see ripple effects in other domains—from our relationships to our work performance.

Research insight: Changing workplace culture to reject the ideal worker norm reduces stress and supports work-life balance. (Schor et al., 2022)

Strategy 1: Ideal Worker Norm

Healthy norms fuel connection and well-being while enabling mastery through focused work. When availability expectations change, people can recover, think clearly, and show up fully at work and at home.

How to apply this:

In 20–30 minutes, draft and share a one‑page team norms doc that sets no after‑hours messaging, a 24‑hour response window for non‑urgent items, meeting‑light Fridays, and explicit support for caregiving needs—then invite feedback.

Research note: “Changing workplace culture to reject the ideal worker norm reduces stress and supports work-life balance.” — Schor et al., 2022

Strategy 2: Trust

Connection and clear expectations build trust and reduce anxiety, strengthening relationships and collective efficacy. This supports purpose and prosocial behavior.

How to apply this:

Before collaboration begins, initiate 5–10 minutes of rapport-building and propose 2–3 simple norms (e.g., equal talk time, clear commitments, repair steps if norms are broken).

Research note: “Building interpersonal connections and establishing social norms with punishment opportunities increases cooperation and trustworthiness.” — Fehr & Gächter, 2000

Strategy 3: Cooperation

Strong norms and connection elevate belonging and prosocial behavior, strengthening relationships and shared purpose. Clear expectations reduce stress and the need for willpower later.

How to apply this:

Before a joint task or negotiation, spend 5–10 minutes to build rapport, agree on fair-share expectations, and clarify how the group will handle violations (e.g., pause to review, escalate, or exit).

Research note: “Building interpersonal connections and establishing social norms with punishment opportunities increases cooperation and trustworthiness.” — Fehr & Gächter, 2000

What the Research Shows

The strategies we’ve discussed aren’t just anecdotal—they’re backed by rigorous scientific research. Here’s what the evidence tells us:

Key findings:

  • 69% reduction in burnout: Percentage of employees experiencing lower burnout levels six months after starting a four-day work week trial (Research led by Juliet Schor on over 400 companies and 11,000 employees)
  • 94-95% employee preference: Percentage of employees who preferred the four-day work week over the traditional five-day week (Employee surveys conducted during four-day week trials)
  • Up to 13% salary increase required to return to five-day week: Reported by employees who would demand a pay raise to give up the four-day work week (Employee survey data from trials)
  • Under twenty percent of offers below 20% in ultimatum game are accepted: Rejection rates of unfair offers in ultimatum game experiments (Werner Güth’s ultimatum game research)
  • Under twenty percent of offers below 20% in ultimatum game are accepted: Rejection rates of unfair offers in ultimatum game experiments (Werner Güth’s ultimatum game research)

Research insights:

Changing workplace culture to reject the ideal worker norm reduces stress and supports work-life balance. — Schor et al., 2022

The ideal worker norm privileges constant availability, increasing stress and reinforcing gender inequality in many workplaces. — Schor, 1991

Reducing after‑hours demands and clarifying response windows improves perceived effectiveness, a dimension inversely related to burnout. — Maslach, 2017

Building interpersonal connections and establishing social norms with punishment opportunities increases cooperation and trustworthiness. — Fehr & Gächter, 2000

Putting It Into Practice

Knowing the science is one thing—putting it into practice is another. Here’s how to start:

Start small: Pick just one strategy from this guide and commit to trying it for a week. Small, consistent actions compound over time.

Track your progress: Notice how you feel before and after implementing these practices. Awareness helps reinforce positive habits.

Be patient: Meaningful change takes time. Research shows it can take anywhere from 18 to 254 days to form a new habit, with an average of 66 days.

Get support: Consider using tools designed to help you build these habits. Apps like Neurise provide personalized, science-backed recommendations tailored to your specific needs and goals.

Quick-start actions:

  • In 20–30 minutes, draft and share a one‑page team norms doc that sets no after‑hours messaging, a 24‑hour response window for non‑urgent items, meetin…
  • Before collaboration begins, initiate 5–10 minutes of rapport-building and propose 2–3 simple norms (e.g., equal talk time, clear commitments, repair …
  • Before a joint task or negotiation, spend 5–10 minutes to build rapport, agree on fair-share expectations, and clarify how the group will handle viola…

Conclusion

Improving psychological safety is a journey, not a destination. The strategies we’ve explored in this guide—backed by research from leading scientists in positive psychology—offer a roadmap for meaningful progress.

Remember that small, consistent actions often outperform ambitious but unsustainable efforts. Start with one technique that resonates with you, practice it until it feels natural, then gradually expand your repertoire.

The science is clear: we have more control over our well-being than we often realize. By applying evidence-based strategies, you can make real progress toward a happier, more fulfilling life.

Take the Next Step

Ready to put these insights into action? Neurise makes it easy with personalized, science-backed recommendations delivered daily. Our app learns what works for you and helps you build lasting habits for happiness and well-being.

Download Neurise and start your journey to a happier life today.

Sources

  1. Schor et al., 2022. Four Days a Week: The Life Changing Solution for Reducing Employee Stress, Improving Wellbeing, and Working Smarter. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/four-days-a-week-juliet-schor?variant=43110374866978
  2. Schor, 1991. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. https://www.amazon.com/Overworked-American-Unexpected-Decline-Leisure/dp/0465083649
  3. Maslach, 2017. Burnout research by Maslach.
  4. Fehr & Gächter, 2000. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments.. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(00)00001-5
  5. Güth et al., 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90011-6
  6. Güth et al., 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345663
  7. Güth et al., 2000. Public goods and bargaining experiments. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-732X(00)00113-4
  8. Güth et al., 1982. Ultimatum game research. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345953
  9. Russell et al., 2016. The Danish Secret to Happy Kids. https://www.amazon.com/dp/191154530X
  10. Helliwell et al., 2020. World Happiness Report. https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/
  11. Russell et al., 2018. The Danish Secret to Happy Kids. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1473664014
  12. Helliwell et al., 2022. World Happiness Report. https://worldhappiness.report/yur2022/
  13. Juul, 2015. The Danish Secret to Happy Kids. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1473664014
  14. Aldao et al., 2010. The role of emotion regulation in children’s development. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188691000080X
  15. Lindstrom Johnson et al., 2017. Parental monitoring and children’s anxiety. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22449
  16. Vagos et al., 2019. Intergenerational trauma as a risk factor for mental health. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10464-019-00320-8
  17. Doyle et al., 2021. We Can Do Hard Things. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1797209163
  18. Neff et al., 2021. Self-Compassion research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110508
  19. Bluth et al., 2016. Child/adolescent well-being findings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.028
  20. Neff, 2011. Self-Compassion research. https://self-compassion.org/